August 23rd, 2008

Standard Podcast [9:16m]:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download
The Olympic Games are about national pride and goodwill through sport and fair competition not arrogant displays of personal athletic superiority. Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt shamed himself and Jamaica by not performing to the best of his abilities for his country but instead deciding during the 100m finals to let up and celebrate through the last 15 meters of the race.
Granted he won the race and set a new world record but he did not run as fast as he could have when he had a chance to perform at an even higher level for his country on the largest stage of all sport. Maybe not all athletes feel about their countries as American’s do but can you imagine Michael Phelps popping his head from the water and whopping it up as he came into the wall during one of his gold medal, world record setting races. Bolt said he was just happy when he realized he was going to be an Olympic champion, but could that celebration have not waited another half a second?
I personally think he didn’t want to break the world record by very much as he could have because when he goes to run on Europe next month he will be offered a million dollars and more for breaking a world record at their meet. So did Bolt sellout his country’s Olympic glory for future cash? Or was he truly just jubilant? What do you think does showboating have its place in the Olympics? I think being proud of your accomplishments is perfectly fine and the celebration of those same feats is fine too as long as they are not done during the course of play.
Leave me a comment and let me know what you think about Usain Bolt’s performance and what level of respect athletes should show when representing their countries on a world stage.
Tags: 100 meters, 100m, Bejing Olympics, celebrating, celebration, Jamaica, Olympic Games, showboating, sprinters, track and field, Usain Bolt
Posted in News, Sports | 1 Comment »
August 23rd, 2008

Standard Podcast [11:07m]:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download
Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama
is promising change if we vote him into the White House. What change would you like to see come of a Barack Obama presidency? Of all of the political changes that can be made with energy policy, national defense, foreign policy, and healthcare what other changes would you like to see come from his presidency, non political changes.
As a Black man I would like to see an attitude change in America and globally about Black men. I hope that with a black man in the White House people will begin to be able to see black men without being afraid, without thinking the worst about us, without lumping all of us into the same group categorized by stereotypes and racism. I know this is not something he can legislate or a political battle he can fight, nor does he have to. All he has to do is not screw up and make us look bad.
Tags: Barack Obama, black men, change, Racism
Posted in Politics | No Comments »
May 12th, 2008
There is currently a civil war within the Black Community men vs. women. Are you sleeping with the enemy or loving your ally? Black men and women in America have been fighting the forces of racism for
hundreds of years and fighting each other off and on for that same amount of time. This war is not a naturally occurring conflict but one orchestrated by White slave owners to control their Black slaves as laid out in the infamous “Willie Lynch Letter.” Throughout the course of the conflict Black women have had a powerful ally in the White male. White men set out to make Black women independent and at the same time emasculating Black men by beating them in front of their women. While slavery ended years ago the mindset of slavery has been past down from generation to generation with both Black and White people.
There was a time when the Black woman was able to see through the schemes of racist and they fought against it refusing to become romantically involved with their White cohorts. However, deep seated resentment of the Black man, and the Black woman’s constant professing of
her independence prevented the family from stabilizing. Now, after a brief period of economic prosperity and political gains for Black men, Black women have re-allied themselves with their white co-conspirators and Black men are again being marginalized.
This time however, the battle is different because Black women have decided to abandon Black men on all fronts and they are flat out excluding Black men from the dating, marrying, education, and employment pool and only going after White men and men of any other race other than their own. Black men too are dating interracially however Black men are not leaving the community. Black women on the other hand are leaving in by the scores and taking their much needed intellectual, financial, and spiritual resources with them.
Interracial relationships are not the problem in the Black community the problem is that many Blacks practice intra-racial racism.
Tags: Black Community, black men, Black on Black, black women, Civil War, Hate, Interracial Relationships, intra-racial racism, Racism, Sellout
Posted in Relationships | 5 Comments »
May 3rd, 2008
If you invited a friend over for dinner and offered them nearly all that you had only to discover that they were stealing from you
would you invite them back? would you continue that friendship? The State of Israel has had America as a best friend since its modern day inception. The United States has shared secrets, intelligence, and technology with Israel so there is no need to for them to steal from us but they consistently spy on our country. As an American how do you stand in opposition to the behaviors of Israel without being labeled an anti-Semite? I take issue with Israel not because of the ethnic make up of its citizenry but because of it’s polices that violate U.S. national security and tarnish America’s already fragile international reputation.
The United Stated has long been courting friends and allies in the Middle East however; those efforts have been hampered by our close relationship with Israel.
One of the loudest complaints lodged against the U.S. by Arab nations in the Middle East is that America is providing Israel with weapons and weapons technology used to attack their countries and civilians in violation of the United States own Arms Export Control Act of which states, “Sec. 4.44 Purposes for Which Military Sales by the United States Are Authorized.—Defense articles and defense services shall be sold or leased by the United States Government under this Act to friendly countries solely for internal security, for legitimate Self-defense.” Israel has violated this section of the agreement by using war planes and cluster bombs for offensive measures against civilian targets in its 2006 conflict against Lebanon. Because of this violation the transfer of weapons and weapons technology to Israel should be suspended. One could even make the argument that because of it espionage activities against the United States Israel should have its friendly nation status revoked and aid to Israel should be halted until further review of the stability of our countries relationship.
Each and every presidential candidate must profess their undying love for Israel and to do otherwise would
be to commit political suicide. However, if any of these same candidates were to offer the same level of affection to any other country that had violated our national security that candidate would be labeled as weak or worse, anti-American. So how do we get our candidates to put American interest first? Why should we expect our presidential candidates to treat Israel as a friendly nation when they assault our sovereignty by spying on us and consistently violate U.S. arms agreements?
To be clear I am not some sort of Zionist that does not believe Israel should exist. I fully support the right of Israel to exist as an independent nation and as any other nation caught practicing espionage against the U.S. and violating arms agreements they should be punished swiftly and severely with economic political sanctions in accordance with United Nations articles.